Investment Property Accounting: Recognition, Measurement & Entries

by Eduyush Team

Investment Property Accounting (IAS 40) Guide

Key Takeaways
  • Investment property accounting under IFRS follows IAS 40, which covers property held for rental income or capital appreciation.
  • Recognition requires probable future economic benefits and reliable cost measurement.
  • Initial measurement is always at cost — including purchase price and transaction costs.
  • Subsequent measurement uses either the fair value model or the cost model.
  • Rental income is recognised as revenue; associated operating expenses are charged to P&L.

Investment property accounting under IFRS refers to the set of rules in IAS 40 that govern how property held to earn rental income or achieve capital appreciation is recognised, measured, and disclosed. Unlike owner-occupied property — which follows IAS 16 — investment property has its own distinct accounting framework that allows entities to choose between recognising fair value changes in profit or loss or carrying the asset at depreciated cost.

This guide walks through every stage of investment property accounting: from determining whether a property qualifies, through recognition and initial measurement, to ongoing measurement options and the treatment of rental income. All examples use Delta Properties Ltd for consistency.

What Qualifies as Investment Property?

The first step in investment property accounting is determining whether the asset meets the IAS 40 definition. Investment property is land or a building — or part of a building — held for one or both of the following purposes:

  • Earning rental income — through operating leases granted to tenants
  • Capital appreciation — holding the asset for long-term value growth

The critical distinction is that investment property generates cash flows largely independently of other assets. If the entity uses the property in its own operations, it is owner-occupied property under IAS 16, not investment property.

Quick Classification Guide

Property Type Classification Standard
Office building leased to tenants Investment property IAS 40
Land held for capital appreciation Investment property IAS 40
Office used by the entity's own staff Owner-occupied property IAS 16
Property being developed for sale Inventory / asset held for sale IAS 2 / IFRS 5
Property under construction for future rental Investment property under construction IAS 40
Hotel operated by the owner Owner-occupied (service component significant) IAS 16

Mixed-Use Property

When a property is used partly for investment and partly for owner-occupation, the portions should be accounted for separately if they can be sold or leased separately. If they cannot be separated, the property is classified as investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant.

Pro Tip: The classification decision is made at the individual property level, not at the portfolio level. Each property — or each separable portion — is assessed independently against the IAS 40 definition. Document your reasoning in your accounting policy notes.

Recognition Criteria Under IFRS

An entity recognises an investment property when and only when both of the following criteria are satisfied (IAS 40.16):

Criterion 1: Probable Future Economic Benefits

It must be probable that future economic benefits associated with the investment property will flow to the entity. For rental property, this typically means a signed lease agreement or a demonstrated history of rental demand in the area. For property held for capital appreciation, the entity should have a reasonable basis for expecting value growth.

Criterion 2: Reliable Measurement of Cost

The cost of the investment property must be measurable reliably. In the vast majority of cases — especially for purchased properties — the purchase price documented in a sale contract provides a reliable measure of cost.

When to Recognise — Practical Application

Recognition generally occurs at the point of legal transfer of ownership (settlement/completion date) or at the date when the entity gains control of the property — whichever represents when the risks and rewards of ownership transfer. In most property transactions, this aligns with the completion date in the sale contract.

Subsequent Expenditure

Subsequent expenditure on an investment property is capitalised only if it meets the same two recognition criteria — probable future economic benefits and reliable measurement. Expenditure that merely maintains the existing service potential (repairs and maintenance) is expensed in the period incurred.

Watch Out: Replacing a major component (e.g., a building's entire HVAC system) is capitalised — and the old component is derecognised. Painting walls or fixing a minor leak? Expense it. The key test is whether the expenditure enhances the asset beyond its previously assessed standard of performance.

Initial Measurement of Investment Property

All investment properties are measured initially at cost — regardless of which subsequent measurement model the entity uses (IAS 40.20). Cost comprises:

Components of Cost

Included in Cost Excluded from Cost
Purchase price (net of trade discounts/rebates) Start-up costs (unless necessary to bring to working condition)
Legal fees and stamp duty Initial operating losses before planned occupancy
Transfer taxes Abnormal waste during construction
Professional fees (surveyor, valuation at acquisition) Administration and general overhead costs
Directly attributable borrowing costs (IAS 23, if applicable) Subsequent advertising and marketing costs

Delta Properties Ltd — Initial Recognition

Acquisition of Office Building for Investment:

Purchase price:                       $800,000
Transaction costs (legal, stamp duty): $20,000
Total cost recognised:             $820,000

Journal Entry:
Dr Investment Property     $820,000
    Cr Bank                         $820,000

The $20,000 in transaction costs is not expensed — it is capitalised as part of the asset's cost.

Properties Acquired Through Exchange

If investment property is acquired by exchanging a non-monetary asset (or a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets), the cost equals the fair value of the asset given up, unless:

  • The exchange transaction lacks commercial substance, or
  • The fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably measurable — in which case cost equals the carrying amount of the asset given up.

Subsequent Measurement Options

After initial recognition at cost, the entity must choose one of two measurement models for all subsequent periods:

Option 1 — Fair Value Model

The investment property is carried at fair value at each reporting date. All changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss. No depreciation is charged. Fair value is determined per IFRS 13 — ideally using Level 1 (quoted prices) or Level 2 (observable market data) inputs. Level 3 inputs (unobservable) may be used but require extensive disclosure.

Option 2 — Cost Model

The investment property is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. The entity follows all IAS 16 principles for depreciation (method, useful life, residual value review). The fair value must still be disclosed in notes — it is just not recognised in the financial statements.

For a detailed comparison of both models including pros, cons, and financial statement impact, see our guide: IAS 40 Fair Value Model vs Cost Model.

Delta Properties — Year 1 Subsequent Measurement:

Fair Value Model:
Fair value at year-end: $870,000 (gain of $50,000 recognised in P&L)
Carrying amount: $870,000

Cost Model:
Cost: $820,000 | Useful life: 50 years
Depreciation: $820,000 ÷ 50 = $16,400 per year
Carrying amount after Year 1: $820,000 − $16,400 = $803,600
Fair value $870,000 disclosed in notes only

Rental Income Accounting Under IFRS

Rental income from investment property is recognised in profit or loss. Under IFRS 16 (for lessors who grant operating leases), rental income should be recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term — unless another systematic basis better represents the pattern in which the benefit from the leased asset is diminished.

Straight-Line Lease Incentives

If a landlord grants a rent-free period or a rent holiday at the start of a lease, the total rental income over the entire lease term must be recognised evenly — the rent-free period does not reduce income during that period. Instead, a deferred income liability is created during the rent-free period and released over the remaining lease term.

Delta Properties — Rental Income

Annual rental income: $60,000

Monthly rental: $5,000 received in arrears

Monthly journal entry (receipt):
Dr Bank                                $5,000
    Cr Rental Income (P&L)          $5,000

If accrued at month-end before receipt:
Dr Rent Receivable                  $5,000
    Cr Rental Income (P&L)          $5,000

Treatment of Lease Deposits

Security deposits received from tenants are financial liabilities — they belong to the tenant and must be returned at lease end. They are not recognised as income. They are shown as current or non-current liabilities depending on the expected repayment timing.

Operating Expenses Treatment

Direct operating expenses relating to investment property — whether or not the property generated rental income during the period — are recognised in profit or loss. These include:

  • Property management fees
  • Building insurance
  • Repairs and maintenance (routine)
  • Council rates and property taxes
  • Utilities paid by the landlord

IAS 40 requires separate disclosure of:

  • Operating expenses from investment property that generated rental income during the period
  • Operating expenses from investment property that did not generate rental income during the period (e.g., vacant property)
Pro Tip: Keep separate cost centres or cost codes for investment property vs owner-occupied property. This makes the IAS 40 disclosure requirements much easier to satisfy and simplifies the annual audit process.

Full Worked Example — Delta Properties Ltd

Year 1 Transactions Summary

Delta Properties Ltd acquires an office building at the beginning of Year 1 and leases it to a commercial tenant.

Transaction Amount Accounting Treatment
Acquisition (purchase price + costs) $820,000 Dr Investment Property $820,000
Annual rental income received $60,000 Cr Rental Income $60,000
Property management fee $4,800 Dr Property Expenses $4,800
Insurance paid $1,200 Dr Property Expenses $1,200
Fair value gain (fair value model) $50,000 Dr Investment Property / Cr P&L $50,000
Depreciation (cost model alternative) $16,400 Dr Depreciation / Cr Acc. Depreciation $16,400

Profit & Loss Summary — Year 1

P&L Line Fair Value Model Cost Model
Rental income $60,000 $60,000
Fair value gain $50,000 —
Property management fee ($4,800) ($4,800)
Insurance ($1,200) ($1,200)
Depreciation — ($16,400)
Net contribution $104,000 $37,600

Balance Sheet — End of Year 1

Item Fair Value Model Cost Model
Investment Property $870,000 $803,600
Disclosed fair value (notes) N/A (on face) $870,000

For step-by-step journal entries covering transfers between categories and disposals, see our comprehensive guide: IAS 40 Examples & Journal Entries.

Understanding how investment property fits within the broader financial statements is important. Our financial statements guide and depreciation accounting guide provide essential context.

Related Reading

Frequently Asked Questions — Investment Property Accounting

1. How is investment property different from owner-occupied property in accounting?

Investment property is governed by IAS 40 and can be measured at fair value (with gains/losses in P&L) or at cost (depreciated per IAS 16). Owner-occupied property always uses IAS 16, which allows a choice between the cost model and the revaluation model (where surpluses go to OCI, not P&L). The key accounting difference is that fair value gains on investment property go through P&L under IAS 40, while revaluation surpluses under IAS 16 go through OCI.

2. Are transaction costs capitalised when acquiring investment property?

Yes. Under IAS 40, all directly attributable transaction costs — including legal fees, stamp duty, agent commissions, and transfer taxes — are capitalised as part of the initial cost of the investment property. They are not expensed in the period of acquisition.

3. How is rental income from investment property recognised?

Rental income from investment property is recognised as revenue in profit or loss. For operating leases granted to tenants, IFRS 16 requires recognition on a straight-line basis over the lease term, unless another systematic basis better reflects the pattern of benefit. Lease incentives such as rent-free periods are spread over the full lease term.

4. What happens if an investment property becomes vacant?

A vacant investment property that is held for rental purposes remains classified as investment property — it does not become owner-occupied property simply because it is temporarily empty. Operating expenses incurred during the vacant period are still recognised in P&L, and IAS 40 requires separate disclosure of operating expenses for investment property that did not generate rental income during the period.

5. Can borrowing costs be capitalised for investment property under construction?

Yes. IAS 23 Borrowing Costs permits (and in most cases requires) capitalisation of borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, or development of a qualifying asset. Investment property under construction or development that takes a substantial period of time to complete qualifies as a qualifying asset under IAS 23. Once construction is complete, borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.

6. How is investment property shown on the balance sheet?

Investment property is shown as a separate line item within non-current assets on the balance sheet. Under the fair value model, it is presented at fair value — there is no accumulated depreciation to disclose on the face of the balance sheet. Under the cost model, the presentation matches IAS 16 — cost and accumulated depreciation may be shown separately or as a net amount, with details in the notes.

7. What standard applies if investment property is held by a lessee under an operating lease?

Under IFRS 16, a lessee has a right-of-use asset for all leases (with some exceptions). If the underlying leased property meets the IAS 40 definition of investment property, the lessee may elect to classify the right-of-use asset as investment property. If this election is made, the entity must apply the fair value model to all its investment property, including any such right-of-use assets.

Build Expertise in IFRS Accounting

Investment property accounting is a tested area in the ACCA DipIFR. Our structured resources help you build deep, exam-ready understanding of IAS 40 and every other major IFRS standard.

Explore ACCA DipIFR Course Best Books on IFRS

About the Author

Eduyush Team — Our content is created by qualified accounting and finance professionals with extensive experience in IFRS, ACCA, CMA, and CPA curriculum design. The Eduyush Team brings together practitioners and educators to deliver technically accurate, exam-relevant guidance for accounting students and professionals worldwide.

Expertise: IFRS Standards | Investment Property | Rental Income Accounting | IAS 40 | Financial Reporting


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.