IAS 40 Examples & Journal Entries (Step-by-Step)

by Eduyush Team

IAS 40 Journal Entries: Examples & Step-by-Step

Key Takeaways
  • All IAS 40 journal entries begin with initial recognition at cost — regardless of which subsequent measurement model is used.
  • Under the fair value model, fair value movements are recorded directly to the investment property account with the corresponding entry in profit or loss.
  • Under the cost model, depreciation is recorded each period; fair value changes are not journalised.
  • Transfers between categories trigger specific measurement adjustments at the transfer date.
  • Disposal gains and losses are calculated as net proceeds minus the carrying amount at the date of disposal.

IAS 40 journal entries follow a logical progression: initial recognition at cost, subsequent measurement using the fair value or cost model, transfers between categories, and final disposal. Each scenario has a specific accounting treatment under IAS 40, and mastering these entries is essential for IFRS exams and professional practice.

This guide provides step-by-step journal entries for every IAS 40 scenario, with full worked examples using Delta Properties Ltd. Each entry includes the relevant account names, amounts, and the IAS 40 paragraph that supports the treatment.

Journal Entry 1: Initial Recognition at Cost

All investment property — regardless of which subsequent measurement model will be used — is recognised initially at cost. Cost includes the purchase price and all directly attributable transaction costs.

IAS 40.20: "Investment property shall be measured initially at its cost. Transaction costs shall be included in the initial measurement."

Delta Properties Ltd — Acquisition

Facts: Delta acquires an office building for $800,000. Legal fees and stamp duty total $20,000.
Journal Entry — Acquisition:

Dr   Investment Property                         $820,000
       Cr   Bank                                            $820,000

To recognise acquisition of investment property at cost
(purchase price $800,000 + transaction costs $20,000)
Common Mistake: Do not split the transaction — many students debit investment property for only $800,000 and expense the $20,000. Under IAS 40, all directly attributable transaction costs are capitalised as part of the asset's cost.

Journal Entry 2: Fair Value Gain — Fair Value Model

Under the fair value model, when the fair value of the investment property increases between reporting dates, the increase is recognised as a gain in profit or loss. The carrying amount of the investment property is increased to reflect the new fair value.

IAS 40.35: "A gain or loss arising from a change in the fair value of investment property shall be recognised in profit or loss for the period in which it arises."

Facts: Delta's investment property has a carrying amount of $820,000 at acquisition. Fair value at year-end 1: $870,000. Fair value gain = $870,000 − $820,000 = $50,000.

Journal Entry — Fair Value Gain (Year 1):

Dr   Investment Property                        $50,000
       Cr   Fair Value Gain on Investment Property (P&L)   $50,000

To recognise increase in fair value of investment property
(IAS 40.35) — recognised directly in profit or loss, NOT in OCI
Key Distinction: This is different from the IAS 16 revaluation model, where surpluses go to OCI (revaluation surplus). Under IAS 40 fair value model, ALL movements go through profit or loss — gains and losses alike. There is no revaluation reserve for investment property.

Journal Entry 3: Fair Value Loss — Fair Value Model

When the fair value of investment property decreases, a loss is recognised in profit or loss and the carrying amount of the investment property is reduced. There is no floor on how much can be recognised as a loss — unlike IAS 16 revaluations, there is no revaluation surplus to absorb losses first.

Facts (Year 2 — continued): Delta's investment property carrying amount at start of Year 2: $870,000. Fair value at end of Year 2: $840,000. Fair value loss = $870,000 − $840,000 = $30,000.

Journal Entry — Fair Value Loss (Year 2):

Dr   Fair Value Loss on Investment Property (P&L)   $30,000
       Cr   Investment Property                             $30,000

To recognise decrease in fair value of investment property
Closing carrying amount Year 2: $870,000 − $30,000 = $840,000

Journal Entry 4: Depreciation — Cost Model

Under the cost model, investment property is depreciated over its useful life using a systematic basis (typically straight-line). The approach follows IAS 16 principles: determine the depreciable amount (cost less residual value) and charge it evenly over the useful life.

Facts: Delta's investment property: cost $820,000 | useful life 50 years | nil residual value | straight-line method.

Annual depreciation = $820,000 ÷ 50 = $16,400

Journal Entry — Annual Depreciation (Cost Model):

Dr   Depreciation Expense                        $16,400
       Cr   Accumulated Depreciation — Investment Property   $16,400

To charge annual depreciation on investment property (cost model)
Carrying amount after Year 1: $820,000 − $16,400 = $803,600

Cost Model — Multi-Year Carrying Amounts

Year Opening CA $ Depreciation $ Closing CA $ FV (disclosed) $
Year 1 820,000 (16,400) 803,600 870,000
Year 2 803,600 (16,400) 787,200 840,000
Year 3 787,200 (16,400) 770,800 860,000

Journal Entry 5: Rental Income

Rental income is recognised as revenue in profit or loss. It is accounted for separately from fair value movements or depreciation — rental income applies identically under both the fair value model and the cost model.

Facts: Delta receives $60,000 per year in rental income ($5,000 per month) from the tenant.

Monthly Journal Entry — Rental Receipt:

Dr   Bank                              $5,000
       Cr   Rental Income (P&L)                $5,000

If rent is accrued at period-end (not yet received):

Dr   Rent Receivable                      $5,000
       Cr   Rental Income (P&L)                $5,000

On receipt of the accrued rent:
Dr   Bank                              $5,000
       Cr   Rent Receivable                     $5,000

Journal Entry 6: Transfer from Investment Property to PPE (Owner-Occupied)

When an entity begins to occupy an investment property that was previously measured at fair value, a transfer out of investment property into PPE (IAS 16) is made. The deemed cost for the PPE is the fair value at the date of transfer. No gain or loss is recognised at the transfer date — the change in use simply reclassifies the asset.

IAS 40.60: "For a transfer from investment property carried at fair value to owner-occupied property or inventories, the property's deemed cost for subsequent accounting in accordance with IAS 16 or IAS 2 shall be its fair value at the date of change in use."

Facts: Delta decides to occupy the property at the start of Year 3. At that date, the fair value is $860,000.

Step 1 — Bring carrying amount to fair value at transfer date (if not already updated):
Dr   Investment Property                        $20,000
       Cr   Fair Value Gain (P&L)                       $20,000
(If fair value at transfer date differs from last-reported carrying amount)

Step 2 — Reclassify to PPE at fair value (deemed cost):
Dr   Property, Plant & Equipment                $860,000
       Cr   Investment Property                          $860,000

The PPE is now recorded at $860,000. Depreciation under IAS 16 begins from this date using the new deemed cost.

Journal Entry 7: Transfer from PPE to Investment Property

When an entity stops using a building in its own operations and begins leasing it to third parties, the asset transfers from PPE to investment property. If the fair value model is used, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and the carrying amount is treated as a revaluation under IAS 16 at that date.

IAS 40.61: "For a transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property carried at fair value, an entity shall apply IAS 16 up to the date of change in use."

Facts: Delta's PPE (owner-occupied building) has a carrying amount of $700,000 at transfer date. Fair value at transfer date: $760,000.

The difference ($60,000) is treated as a revaluation surplus under IAS 16:

Dr   Investment Property                           $760,000
       Cr   Property, Plant & Equipment               $700,000
       Cr   Other Comprehensive Income (Revaluation Surplus)   $60,000

Note: The $60,000 goes to OCI (revaluation surplus under IAS 16) — it does NOT go to profit or loss at the transfer date. Future fair value movements after transfer are then recognised in P&L under IAS 40.
Critical Distinction: This is the one scenario where a credit goes to OCI rather than P&L under IAS 40. Once the property is investment property, subsequent fair value changes go to P&L as usual. The OCI treatment only applies at the transfer date for the difference between carrying amount and fair value at that point.

Journal Entry 8: Transfer from Investment Property to Inventory

When an entity begins to develop investment property with a view to selling it (rather than continuing to hold it for capital appreciation or rental), the property transfers to inventory. The deemed cost for inventory purposes is the fair value at the date the development for sale commences.

IAS 40.57(d): "Transfers from investment property shall be made when, and only when, there is a change of use, evidenced by ... commencement of development with a view to sale."

Facts: Delta decides to develop and sell the investment property. Fair value at the date development commences: $875,000. Current carrying amount (fair value model): $870,000. Gain at transfer = $875,000 − $870,000 = $5,000.

Step 1 — Update fair value to transfer date:
Dr   Investment Property                        $5,000
       Cr   Fair Value Gain (P&L)                       $5,000

Step 2 — Reclassify to Inventory at fair value (deemed cost):
Dr   Inventory (Property Held for Sale)          $875,000
       Cr   Investment Property                          $875,000

After reclassification, the property is accounted for under IAS 2 (inventory).

Journal Entry 9: Disposal of Investment Property

When an investment property is sold or permanently withdrawn from use (with no future economic benefits expected from disposal), it is derecognised. The gain or loss on disposal equals the net disposal proceeds minus the carrying amount at the disposal date.

Disposal — Fair Value Model

Facts: Delta sells the investment property at the end of Year 1 for $900,000 (fair value model). Carrying amount at year-end Year 1 (after FV update): $870,000.

Gain on disposal = $900,000 − $870,000 = $30,000

Journal Entry:

Dr   Bank (Proceeds)                                       $900,000
       Cr   Investment Property                                  $870,000
       Cr   Gain on Disposal of Investment Property (P&L)   $30,000

To derecognise investment property and recognise gain on disposal.

Disposal — Cost Model

Facts: Delta sells the investment property at the end of Year 1 for $900,000 (cost model). Carrying amount: $803,600 (cost $820,000 less depreciation $16,400).

Gain on disposal = $900,000 − $803,600 = $96,400

Journal Entry:

Dr   Bank                                                        $900,000
Dr   Accumulated Depreciation                           $16,400
       Cr   Investment Property (cost)                            $820,000
       Cr   Gain on Disposal (P&L)                                 $96,400

Note: Under the cost model, the gain is larger because the carrying amount is lower (due to depreciation). This does not mean the cost model produces better returns — it simply reflects a lower net book value at disposal.

Multi-Year Worked Example — Delta Properties Ltd

Let us trace Delta Properties through three full years under the fair value model, then compare the cumulative position.

Setup

  • Acquisition: $820,000 at start of Year 1
  • Annual rental income: $60,000
  • Fair values: Year 1 end $870,000 | Year 2 end $840,000 | Year 3 end $900,000
  • Measurement model: Fair value

Year 1 Journal Entries

1. Acquisition:
Dr Investment Property $820,000 | Cr Bank $820,000

2. Rental income (annual):
Dr Bank $60,000 | Cr Rental Income $60,000

3. Fair value gain ($870,000 − $820,000):
Dr Investment Property $50,000 | Cr FV Gain (P&L) $50,000

Closing carrying amount: $870,000 | P&L impact: +$60,000 rental +$50,000 FV gain = +$110,000

Year 2 Journal Entries

1. Rental income:
Dr Bank $60,000 | Cr Rental Income $60,000

2. Fair value loss ($870,000 − $840,000):
Dr FV Loss (P&L) $30,000 | Cr Investment Property $30,000

Closing carrying amount: $840,000 | P&L impact: +$60,000 rental −$30,000 FV loss = +$30,000

Year 3 Journal Entries

1. Rental income:
Dr Bank $60,000 | Cr Rental Income $60,000

2. Fair value gain ($900,000 − $840,000):
Dr Investment Property $60,000 | Cr FV Gain (P&L) $60,000

Closing carrying amount: $900,000 | P&L impact: +$60,000 rental +$60,000 FV gain = +$120,000

Cumulative P&L Summary (Years 1–3)

Year Rental Income FV Gain/(Loss) Net P&L Impact Carrying Amount
Year 1 $60,000 $50,000 $110,000 $870,000
Year 2 $60,000 ($30,000) $30,000 $840,000
Year 3 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 $900,000
Total $180,000 $80,000 $260,000 $900,000

The total fair value gain over three years ($80,000) equals the net movement in carrying amount ($900,000 − $820,000 = $80,000), which confirms the journal entries are correct.

For the full explanation of how these measurement models work and when to choose between them, see our guide: IAS 40 Fair Value Model vs Cost Model.

Understanding how these journal entries flow into the full set of financial statements is important. Our financial statements guide explains how each entry affects the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

Quick Reference: IAS 40 Journal Entry Summary

Scenario Debit Credit
Acquisition at cost Investment Property Bank
Fair value gain (FV model) Investment Property FV Gain (P&L)
Fair value loss (FV model) FV Loss (P&L) Investment Property
Depreciation (cost model) Depreciation Expense Accumulated Depreciation
Rental income received Bank Rental Income (P&L)
Transfer IP → PPE (FV model) PPE (at FV) Investment Property
Transfer PPE → IP (FV model) — surplus Investment Property PPE + OCI (Revaluation Surplus)
Transfer IP → Inventory Inventory (at FV) Investment Property
Disposal (gain) Bank Investment Property + Gain (P&L)
Disposal (loss) Bank + Loss (P&L) Investment Property

Related Reading

Frequently Asked Questions — IAS 40 Journal Entries

1. Do fair value gains on investment property go to OCI or P&L?

Under IAS 40, fair value gains and losses on investment property always go to profit or loss — not to other comprehensive income (OCI). This is the key difference from the IAS 16 revaluation model, where surpluses go to OCI. The only exception under IAS 40 is when owner-occupied property (with an existing revaluation surplus) is transferred to investment property — the surplus arising at the transfer date goes to OCI, but subsequent fair value movements go to P&L.

2. What accounts are debited and credited when investment property is acquired?

At acquisition, you debit Investment Property (non-current asset) and credit Bank (or the consideration paid). The full cost — including purchase price and all directly attributable transaction costs such as legal fees and stamp duty — is included in the debit to Investment Property. Transaction costs are never expensed separately under IAS 40.

3. How do you account for investment property under the cost model after acquisition?

Under the cost model, you charge depreciation each period: debit Depreciation Expense and credit Accumulated Depreciation — Investment Property. The carrying amount reduces each year. You also assess for impairment under IAS 36 if there are indicators of impairment. Rental income is recognised separately as revenue.

4. What is the journal entry when investment property is transferred to inventory?

When investment property (measured at fair value) is transferred to inventory because the entity begins developing it for sale, debit Inventory and credit Investment Property at the fair value at the date of transfer (which becomes the deemed cost for IAS 2 purposes). Any fair value movement up to the transfer date is recognised in P&L before the reclassification journal entry.

5. What is the journal entry for disposal of investment property at a loss?

If proceeds are less than the carrying amount, you debit Bank (proceeds), debit Loss on Disposal (P&L), and credit Investment Property (carrying amount). Under the cost model, you also debit the accumulated depreciation account to zero it out against the gross cost. The net effect removes the asset from the balance sheet and recognises the loss in profit or loss.

6. Can impairment losses on investment property be reversed?

Yes — but only under the cost model. Under IAS 36, impairment losses can be reversed in subsequent periods if the recoverable amount increases. The reversal is limited to the carrying amount that would have existed had no impairment been recognised. Under the fair value model, impairment testing is not relevant because the asset is already carried at its current value — any recovery is automatically captured through the fair value remeasurement.

7. How is the gain on disposal calculated when investment property was measured at cost?

Under the cost model, the gain on disposal = Net proceeds − (Cost − Accumulated depreciation − Accumulated impairment). The gain is typically larger under the cost model than under the fair value model (assuming the property has appreciated) because the carrying amount is lower. However, this does not mean the entity made more money — it simply reflects the accounting treatment. In substance, the total return to the entity is the same regardless of which model was used.

Practice More IAS 40 Questions

The ACCA DipIFR exam regularly tests journal entry scenarios for IAS 40 — including transfers, disposals, and model-specific entries. Our structured resources give you the practice and understanding you need to score top marks.

Explore ACCA DipIFR Course Best Books on IFRS

About the Author

Eduyush Team — Our content is created by qualified accounting and finance professionals with extensive experience in IFRS, ACCA, CMA, and CPA curriculum design. The Eduyush Team brings together practitioners and educators to deliver technically accurate, exam-relevant guidance for accounting students and professionals worldwide.

Expertise: IAS 40 Journal Entries | IFRS Worked Examples | Investment Property | ACCA DipIFR | Financial Accounting


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.