Goodwill Impairment Test (ASC 350): Step-by-Step Process
Goodwill Impairment Test (ASC 350) Step-by-Step
- ASC 350 requires public companies to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, at the reporting unit level.
- Step 0 (qualitative) lets companies bypass the full valuation if impairment is clearly not likely.
- Step 1 (quantitative) compares reporting unit fair value to carrying amount — the gap is the impairment loss.
- The impairment loss is capped at the goodwill balance and cannot be reversed.
- Alpha Corp example: carrying amount $2,000,000, fair value $1,700,000 → $300,000 impairment (goodwill capped at $500,000).
The goodwill impairment test is the annual (or triggered) process under ASC 350 by which a company determines whether the recorded value of goodwill still reflects economic reality — and, if not, by how much it must be written down. Under current FASB guidance, the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount; any excess of carrying amount over fair value is recorded as an impairment loss, capped at the goodwill balance.
This article walks through the complete ASC 350 testing framework — qualitative assessment, quantitative steps, triggering events, and a worked numerical example using Alpha Corp and Beta Inc.
The ASC 350 Goodwill Impairment Framework
ASC 350 (Intangibles — Goodwill and Other) is the FASB standard governing goodwill after initial recognition. The 2017 update (ASU 2017-04) simplified the impairment model significantly by eliminating the old Step 2, which required a hypothetical purchase price allocation. The current two-step framework is:
| Step | Name | Purpose | Required? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 0 | Qualitative Assessment | Determine if impairment is more likely than not | Optional (elective) |
| Step 1 | Quantitative Test | Measure the impairment loss in dollars | Required if Step 0 fails or is skipped |
For context on how this fits into the broader accounting picture, see the Goodwill Impairment Complete Guide.
What Is a Reporting Unit?
Goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level, not the entity level or individual asset level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (a "component") — provided it is a business, its management reviews its financial performance separately, and it has discrete financial information available.
Why Reporting Unit Level Matters
Goodwill from an acquisition is allocated to one or more reporting units that are expected to benefit from the combination. A single acquisition may result in goodwill allocated across multiple reporting units. The impairment test is performed separately for each reporting unit that has goodwill allocated to it.
Triggering Events for Interim Impairment Testing
Annual testing is the baseline, but companies must perform an interim impairment test whenever a triggering event occurs that suggests goodwill may be impaired. ASC 350 identifies the following as triggering events:
- A sustained and significant decrease in stock price or market capitalisation
- A significant adverse change in the business climate or legal environment
- An unanticipated loss of a major customer, contract, or revenue stream
- An expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or significantly reorganised
- A cost factor significantly above expectations (e.g., labour, raw materials, energy)
- A pattern of operating losses in the reporting unit carrying the goodwill
- An adverse change in the economic conditions of the reporting unit's industry
Step 0 — Qualitative Assessment
The qualitative assessment asks a single question: Is it more likely than not (probability greater than 50%) that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount?
If management concludes it is NOT more likely than not, no further testing is needed. If management concludes it IS more likely than not — or if the analysis is inconclusive — the company proceeds to Step 1.
Factors Evaluated in Step 0
Management must consider all relevant events and circumstances. ASC 350 organises these into several categories:
Macroeconomic Conditions
- Deterioration in general economic conditions
- Limitations on access to capital
- Fluctuations in foreign exchange or commodity prices
Industry and Market Factors
- Deterioration in the environment in which the entity operates
- Increased competition
- Decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics
Cost Factors
- Increases in raw materials, labour, or other costs that negatively affect earnings
Overall Financial Performance
- Negative or declining cash flows
- Actual or expected decline in revenue compared to prior periods
- Actual or projected impairment in profitability
Entity-Specific Events
- Changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers
- Pending litigation or regulatory proceedings
- Changes in the composition of a reporting unit's assets
Step 1 — Quantitative Impairment Test
The quantitative goodwill impairment test directly compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount. The mechanics are as follows:
The Core Formula
If Fair Value < Carrying Amount:
Impairment Loss = Carrying Amount − Fair Value
Capped at the total goodwill balance of the reporting unit
Determining Fair Value of the Reporting Unit
Fair value is typically estimated using one or more of these approaches:
| Approach | Method | Best When |
|---|---|---|
| Income Approach | Discounted cash flow (DCF) | Reliable cash flow forecasts available |
| Market Approach | Comparable company multiples or transactions | Active market comparables exist |
| Asset Approach | Net asset value (orderly liquidation basis) | Holding companies or asset-intensive units |
Carrying Amount of the Reporting Unit
The carrying amount includes:
- All assets allocated to the reporting unit (including goodwill)
- All liabilities allocated to the reporting unit
- Both current and non-current components
Note: The carrying amount for impairment purposes is the net carrying amount — assets minus liabilities — including goodwill.
Worked Example: Alpha Corp Acquires Beta Inc
Background
Alpha Corp acquired Beta Inc for $2,000,000. At acquisition, Beta Inc's identifiable net assets had a fair value of $1,500,000, resulting in goodwill of $500,000. This goodwill was allocated entirely to the reporting unit that contains the Beta Inc operations.
Annual Impairment Test — End of Year 1
Alpha Corp performs its annual goodwill impairment test. Management first performs the qualitative assessment (Step 0).
Step 0: Qualitative Assessment
Indicators reviewed:
- The industry in which Beta Inc operates has faced increasing competitive pressure from lower-cost providers.
- Revenue in the reporting unit came in 12% below budget.
- A major customer representing 18% of the unit's revenue decided not to renew its contract.
Conclusion: Based on these factors, management determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit has fallen below its carrying amount. The company must proceed to Step 1.
Step 1: Quantitative Test
Alpha Corp engages a valuation specialist and determines the following:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Carrying amount of reporting unit (incl. $500K goodwill) | $2,000,000 |
| Fair value of reporting unit (DCF + market approach) | $1,700,000 |
| Excess of carrying amount over fair value | $300,000 |
| Goodwill balance (cap on impairment loss) | $500,000 |
| Impairment Loss Recognised | $300,000 |
The impairment loss of $300,000 is within the goodwill cap of $500,000, so the full $300,000 is recognised.
Outcome
- Goodwill before impairment: $500,000
- Impairment loss: $300,000
- New carrying amount of goodwill: $200,000
For the journal entry to record this, see Goodwill Impairment Journal Entry (With Examples).
What If the Shortfall Exceeded the Goodwill Balance?
Suppose the reporting unit's fair value was $1,200,000 instead of $1,700,000:
- Excess of carrying amount over fair value: $2,000,000 − $1,200,000 = $800,000
- Goodwill cap: $500,000
- Impairment loss: $500,000 (capped — goodwill fully written off)
The remaining $300,000 of shortfall is not recognised — goodwill can only go to zero, not negative.
Timing and Documentation Requirements
When to Test
Companies must select a consistent annual testing date and test on the same date each year. The date does not have to be year-end — it can be any point during the fiscal year, provided it is consistent. Most companies align their test with the fiscal year-end for convenience.
Documentation Best Practices
- Document the qualitative assessment in writing, including each factor considered and the conclusion reached
- If proceeding to Step 1, retain the valuation report and supporting assumptions
- Maintain records of how goodwill was allocated to each reporting unit at acquisition
- Document any changes in reporting unit structure that affect goodwill allocation
- Retain all trigger event monitoring records throughout the year
Common Mistakes in Goodwill Impairment Testing
| Mistake | Consequence | How to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Ignoring triggering events | Late impairment recognition, restatements | Formal quarterly monitoring process |
| Testing at wrong level (entity vs reporting unit) | Masking impairment in profitable units | Identify and document all reporting units |
| Unreasonably optimistic DCF assumptions | Avoided write-down challenged by auditors | Use market-corroborated discount rates |
| Forgetting the impairment cap | Overstating the impairment loss | Always cap at goodwill balance |
| Changing the annual test date without justification | Audit concern, inconsistency | Use same date each year; document changes with rationale |
Explore the Full Cluster
- Goodwill Impairment Complete Guide — pillar page covering all fundamentals
- Goodwill Impairment Journal Entry — record the $300K impairment correctly
- Goodwill Amortization vs Impairment — which method applies to your company?
- How to Calculate Goodwill — understand what you're testing before the test
- Retained Earnings Complete Guide — how impairment flows through equity
- What Is a Financial Statement — impairment touches all three statements
The FAR section of the CPA exam regularly tests goodwill impairment mechanics — qualitative assessment criteria, the quantitative formula, and impairment caps. Eduyush's CPA course covers these topics with targeted practice questions and memory aids.
Explore the CPA Course →Frequently Asked Questions
What is the goodwill impairment test under ASC 350?
The ASC 350 goodwill impairment test compares a reporting unit's fair value to its carrying amount (including goodwill). If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss, up to the goodwill balance. The test is performed at least annually.
What is the difference between Step 0 and Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test?
Step 0 is a qualitative assessment that determines whether it is more likely than not that fair value is less than carrying amount — no dollar calculation is required. If Step 0 indicates impairment is possible, Step 1 is the quantitative test that calculates the actual dollar impairment loss.
Can a company skip the qualitative assessment and go straight to Step 1?
Yes. The qualitative assessment (Step 0) is elective. A company may choose to bypass it and perform the quantitative test directly every year. Some companies prefer this approach for simplicity or to satisfy auditor expectations.
What is a reporting unit for goodwill impairment purposes?
A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below — a component with discrete financial information that is reviewed separately by management. Goodwill is allocated to and tested at the reporting unit level, not the consolidated entity or individual asset level.
What triggers an interim goodwill impairment test?
Triggering events include a sustained stock price decline, loss of a major customer, adverse changes in the business climate or regulatory environment, expected disposal of the reporting unit, or a pattern of operating losses.
How is fair value of a reporting unit determined?
Fair value is estimated using the income approach (discounted cash flow), market approach (comparable companies or transactions), or asset approach (net asset value). Companies typically use the income approach, often corroborated by the market approach.
Can goodwill impairment losses under ASC 350 be reversed?
No. Once recorded, a goodwill impairment loss cannot be reversed under US GAAP, even if the reporting unit's value subsequently recovers. The reduced carrying amount of goodwill becomes the new cost basis going forward.
This article was written by the Eduyush Team — accounting educators and CPA exam coaches with extensive experience in US GAAP, IFRS, and professional accounting certifications. Eduyush helps thousands of students pass the CPA, ACCA, CMA, and CIMA exams each year through structured courses and expert-authored content.
Leave a comment